Women in the
Ministry #6
WELCOME TO MESSAGE #6 of our series
entitled “Women In The Ministry”. What part do
women play in the churches today or in the Body
of Christ? What part do they play? This is the
question we’ve been asking, and we have found
out that a lot of people are all mixed up because
of a misunderstanding of Scripture.
On one hand you have the school of thought
which teaches that women can’t say anything in
Church; they must remain silent, and they have
no ministry. Their job is to take care of their
husband, raise the kids, feed the preacher when
he comes over and so on and so forth. Then on
the other hand you have people who have a little
more light on the subject. They believe that
women can’t really teach and preach above the
men, but they can pray and prophesy, they can
sing, and they can even teach Sunday school.
But when it comes to the heavy duty Word of
God, it’s the preacher man that does it all.
“We have found out that a lot of
people are all mixed up because of
a misunderstanding of Scripture.”
Then finally you have those people who have
studied this subject in depth, like we have, and
who have found out that women are a very
special species, because she came out of the
heart of God and out of the side of man, and she
represents and depicts a part of God. And when
you deny her a position in life and in the ministry,
you’re denying God. For years we have fought
for women’s rights, in the true sense of the word.
We’ve stuck to our guns that women are not
underdogs, they’re not inferior, they’re not lesser,
they’re not weaker in terms of their relationship
with God.
Women have a place and they have a
ministry in the work of God. Through the years
there have been many great women of God.
There are many great women in the Bible who
were used greatly of God along with the men. So
the question we have been asking is, “Is it true
that women are to remain silent in the Church,
and if so, who says so?” There are women who
are in bondage to this “keep silent” doctrine all
over the world. For generations and generations
and generations, they’ve been in bondage to the
idea that women have no place in the ministry, or
even in the affairs of society in general. Even
the practicing pagans have taken certain
Scriptures out of the Bible and have used them
to oppress their women for centuries, even
though they don’t believe in Christianity. Some
way, somehow, people all over the world have
come to believe that women are dogs, and that
they are inferior and should only be used as sex
objects and servants.
We’re looking for the perfect balance, and
we’re going to discover it in these messages. It
is really liberating when you study this subject
out in the light of Scripture and you look up the
Greek and Hebrew words. And we need to
approach this subject with an open mind, ready
to accept what the Spirit of God would reveal to
us. In this message, to start off, I’m going to go
back, once again, to the statement in I
Corinthians 14:34-35 to give even more ample
proof that Paul never made that statement which
basically says that women are to keep silent in
the Church. Paul never said it, and God didn’t
say it either.
Let’s go to I Corinthians chapter 14 and read
our text, and then we’ll go back and get a little
background on it. Verse 34 says, “Let your
women keep silence in the churches: for it is
not permitted unto them to speak; but they
are commanded to be under obedience, as
also saith the law.” Verse 35: “And if they will
learn any thing, let them ask their husbands
at home: for it is a shame for women to speak
in the church.”
You know it’s often puzzled me why, if
someone was teaching a message, the women
couldn’t listen and learn as well as anybody else.
Why did they have to go home and ask their
husbands everything that was said? Didn’t they
have any brains to think on their own? These
are some more questions we need to ask
ourselves. For example, if you are a woman and
you are reading this message right now, don’t
you have enough brains to think about what I’m
saying? Can’t you learn on your own, or do you
have to go home and ask your husband what I
was saying? Isn’t that kind of ridiculous?
It also says, “for it is a shame for women to
speak in the church.” The question I want to
ask is, who says it’s a shame? Who says so? I’ll
tell you who, it was the Jewish tradition that said
it was a shame for women to speak in the
Church! The truth is that Paul would have never
said it was a shame, because in I Corinthians
chapter 11 Paul said it was good for women to
pray and prophesy in the Church, as we have
said, which meant they opened their mouths.
And you can find other Scriptures in the New
Testament where Paul commanded them to sing
in the Spirit. Remember, he said that when you
come together, some of you will have a song,
some of you will have a hymn or spiritual song.
And these hymns and songs always contained a
message, which meant that if the women were
allowed to bring forth their hymns and spiritual
songs that they were delivering a message, and
that’s just like preaching the Gospel. So it is
foolish to think that Paul would come along later
in the same letter and dictate silence to the
women in the Church.
Then it goes on in verse 36 and says,
“What? came the word of God out from you?
or came it unto you only?” Who is Paul talking
to? Is he talking to the women? Is he talking to
the Church? Is he talking about himself and the
statement that he just made? Is he rebuking
himself? We can find the answer in verse 37. It
says, “If any man think himself to be a
prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge
that the things that I write unto you are the
commandments of the Lord.” Obviously some
men from the Corinthian church had written Paul
a letter asking him to clarify the issue of women
in the Church, because some so-called prophet
had told them that women must remain silent.
So what Paul was actually doing at the end of
chapter 14 was answering the Corinthian’s
question concerning the Jewish traditions which
were trying to pass themselves off as the Word
of the Lord. Many people who don’t understand
this believe that Paul is confirming verses 34 and
35 when he says “let him acknowledge that
the things that I write unto you are the
commandments of the Lord” in verse 37. This
is an easy assumption to make when you don’t
read verse 36 because it may seem to follow
logically, but it is false. The commandments
concerning women in verses 34 and 35 WERE
NOT something which Paul had ever written the
Corinthians but they were something which the
Corinthians had written to Paul, in asking him to
clear up the controversy. And in answering their
question, Paul restated the controversial (false)
commandments as part of his reply. That’s all.
Let’ s go back and start in I Corinthians
chapter 1. We’ll go back to the very beginning
and ask ourselves why Paul even wrote I
Corinthians. What is the essence of the epistle?
Why did Paul even write to the Corinthians?
One point we need to consider is that the
Corinthian church was mostly made up of
Gentile converts, which meant that they were not
familiar with all the Jewish traditions. Now even
though the majority were Gentiles, obviously
there were some Jewish converts who were
trying to carry over their traditions from Judaism
and force them on the ignorant Corinthian
Gentiles. This point is most important, and it is
vital that we grasp what was going on between
the Jews and the Gentiles in the Corinthian
church. If we can understand that Paul was not
legislating doctrine but that he was settling a
dispute which had risen over Jewish traditions, it
will become clear what Paul was talking about in
I Corinthians chapter 14.
The Jewish converts were trying to bring their
traditions into the Christian Church and Paul
said, “NO! You’re not bringing Jewish traditions
into the Church of Jesus Christ because the
Jews have rejected our Messiah!” God canceled
out the traditions of men and He brought in a
whole new order with Jesus Christ.
In I Corinthians chapter 1 verse 11 it says,
“For it hath been declared unto me of you,
my brethren, by them which are of the house
of Chloe, that there are contentions among
you.” Alright, point number 1—it was declared
unto Paul that there were contentions in the
Corinthian church. Then he goes on in verse 12:
“Now this I say, that every one of you saith,
I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of
Cephas; and I of Christ. Is Christ divided?
Was Paul crucified for you? Or were ye
baptized in the name of Paul?” Obviously
there were contentions and divisions in the
Corinthian church. Some men liked Paul as a
teacher, some men liked Apollos as a teacher,
and some men liked other men as their teachers.
They were divided on who really had the true
Word of God and they had contention going on
and division. And how many know that when
you’ve got contention and division you’ve got
disagreements and problems? So we’re dealing
with a troubled church. That’s a springboard.
Paul is responding to them because they had
problems. Paul is dealing with a mixture in
people’s beliefs. He was dealing with people of
different backgrounds. All these things have got
to be considered when you study the Scriptures.
Many times you can’t just read your Bible and
say, “Oh, that’s what it meant.” You’ve got to go
back and study the circumstances surrounding
the events.
Alright, chapter 7, verse 1, it says, “Now
concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto
me: It is good for a man not to touch a
woman.” This is an important point we need to
go over. If you go back and study the way they
wrote letters in the very early days, what they did
was when they were writing back to a person,
they restated the subject matter in their reply.
In this instance what they wrote to him was, “It
is good for a man not to touch a woman.” Some
people believe that it was Paul making that
statement as a rule—“It is good for a man not to
touch a woman.” If a man isn’t supposed to
touch a woman, how were people going to have
babies and fill the earth? How dumb can we get?
Paul is the one that laid out the order in the
Church about men and women, and he did not
contradict himself or the rest of Scripture. If Paul
had made that statement as a cardinal doctrine
then he would be defeating the purposes of God
because the Church is a picture of a bride and a
husband producing children.
Then in verse 2 Paul goes on to give them
his answer to their question: “Nevertheless, to
avoid fornication, let every man have his own
wife, and let every woman have her own
husband.” Now I don’t see anything here where
Paul is expressing that men are superior to
women. What Paul was saying was that the
woman is to give to the man and the man in turn
is to give right back to the woman. This is a very
good example of what I am trying to explain.
The Corinthians wrote Paul with several
questions and statements regarding Church
operations, and in answering their questions and
correcting their errors he starts out by restating
what they had written to him.
Going on down to verse 25 it says, “Now
concerning virgins I have no commandment
of the Lord: yet I give my judgement, as one
that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be
faithful.” Earlier in chapter 7 he dealt with
married couples and now he is coming over here
and dealing with questions concerning virgins.
Then he goes on to give them advice regarding
that subject. Obviously he is dealing with the
roles of men and women in regards to each
other. I would like to note that Paul spends all of
chapter 7 answering questions concerning the
things which they had written him about men
and women and marriage. He must have felt it
important enough to warrant an entire chapter of
explanation. Paul wanted to make sure that the
Corinthians had a clear understanding in these
areas, and he also knew how easily false
doctrine could creep in and beguile ignorant
Christians. But yet we do not find one place
where Paul says that men are superior to women
and that men are to be the absolute rulers over
their wives.
Moving on to chapter 8 he begins by saying,
“Now as touching things offered unto
idols...” So far he has touched on the questions
of sex and virgins and now he is moving to
another subject which the Corinthians obviously
wanted to know about.
KEY POINT:
“The Corinthians wrote Paul with
several questions and statements
regarding Church operations, and
in answering their questions and
correcting their errors he starts
out by restating what they had
written to him.”
In the following verses Paul goes on to
explain and exhort about idols and idolatry, and
the points that he made are good to this day.
We should not eat food offered unto idols.
When you go into certain restaurants you’ll find
that they have offered their food unto idols, and
when you eat it you’re partaking of that idolatry
and you’ll bring a curse upon you. That’s why
it’s good for Christians to pray over their food.
We should make it a habit to pray over our food
that God would bless and sanctify it.
Going on to chapter 9 we read that Paul
deals with the question of his Apostleship,
because obviously there were Gnostics and
Jews and lots of other men that did not believe
he was an Apostle. He starts out by saying,
“Am I not an apostle?” and he is defending
himself against those who were questioning his
authority. Then we go on to chapter 11 where
he deals with the subject of head coverings.
This is another subject which they had written to
Paul about with questions, and he takes time in
chapter 11 to break through their traditions,
which is a whole teaching in itself. Then we go
on to chapter 12 where we find Paul starting out
again with the phrase “Now concerning...”,
stating, “Now concerning spiritual gifts,
brethren, I would not have you ignorant.”
Then he goes into a long exhortation on spiritual
gifts.
The reason I’m taking time to go over these
different points is so that you can see that almost
the entire letter of I Corinthians was spent in
explaining things, answering questions and
exposing Jewish traditions which had the
Corinthians all confused.
I want to turn right now to Acts chapter 15. It
says in verse 1, “And certain men which came
down from Judea taught the brethren and
said, Except ye be circumcised after the
manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.” Now
this point does tie in to the question of whether
or not women should be silent in the Church.
Once again, I’m trying to show you that there
were troublemakers, there were unbelievers,
there were people that challenged Paul’s
Apostleship and authority. It says, “And certain
men which came down from Judea taught the
brethren and said, Except ye be
circumcised...” These men where trying to
force the new Christians to obey the Old Law,
and Paul was not going to stand for it. He was
not going to sit by and watch as the fruit for
which he had labored was corrupted by Jewish
traditions which Jesus nullified at His death.
Now circumcision was a law that was given
under Moses, carried down from Abraham, and
God instituted laws that were right for that time
and circumstance. Circumcision was a cutting
away of excess flesh, which was a shadow and
type of better things to come. What were the
better things to come? Cutting away of the
excess flesh from your heart, instead of off of
your physical bodies. You see, in the physical,
only men can be circumcised, so where does
that leave the women? But circumcision of the
heart deals with men and women. We’ve all got
carnal, fleshly hearts that God wants to cut
away, symbolically speaking. He’s not going to
go in with an actual scalpel and cut away at your
physical heart. No, what He is going to cut is in
the spirit.
The Jewish converts in the Corinthian church
were trying to set back up the dead ordinances
of the Law regarding circumcision, and they only
partially understood that Christ had brought in a
New Order, a spiritual order. They wanted to
have the best of both Old and New, just to play
it safe. They believed in Jesus but they also
wanted to be circumcised, and that is where Paul
stepped in to straighten things out.
KEY POINT:
“...almost the entire letter of I
Corinthians was spent in
explaining things, answering
questions and exposing Jewish
traditions which had the
Corinthians all confused.”
This situation reminds me of the
denominational Apostolic Church’s doctrine we
find today which teaches that you can’t be saved
unless you’re baptized in water first. How
ridiculous! If that were true then Christ would
have drowned for our sins rather than hung on
the cross and poured out His blood. The
Apostolics, as they call themselves, have made
a twisted cardinal doctrine out of baptism. Yes,
they teach that you’ve got to be baptized in water
before you can be saved, and they don’t even
take time to study it out, and they condemn
people to Hell over their doctrine, and they think
they’re the only ones that are saved and the rest
of us are not saved because we accepted the
blood first and then we were baptized in water.
They say it’s the water first and the blood
second. NO! Christ died by the way of the
cross, His blood ran out for us.
Yes, I agree, baptism is right, yet it is only
symbolic. The water doesn’t save you, it just
gets you wet. But the blood of Jesus Christ will
not only cleanse you, but it will make you a new
creature. It will wash away your sins and
rejuvenate you. And the Scripture in Hebrews
doesn’t say that without baptism there is no
remission of sins; it says that without the
shedding of BLOOD there is no remission of sin.
The reason I wanted to bring this up is because
it is similar to what was happening in Paul’s day.
The Jewish converts were insisting on
circumcision as a prerequisite to salvation, when
in reality, the physical circumcision was only a
symbolic rite, and moreover it was fulfilled in
Christ and thereby annulled. God wants a
spiritual circumcision of our carnal nature.
Going back to Acts chapter 15, reading in
verse 2: “When therefore Paul and Barnabas
had no small dissension and disputation with
them, they determined that Paul and
Barnabas and certain other of them should
go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and
elders about this question.” Brother, they
argued and they contended for the faith. They
didn’t just take whatever came along as the truth,
because they knew better. This was no small
matter going on in the early days of the Church.
So many Christians had and many have all kinds
of problems because they don’t understand
Christ.
In Paul’s day there was a great stirring up,
there were great contentions, divisions and
arguments over doctrine. There were debates,
and the debates have not stopped today. We
still have men and women that absolutely can’t
see. Their eyes are blinded to the truth and they
are so dogmatic when it comes to the subject of
women in the ministry. They use I Corinthians
14:34-35 to justify their false doctrines. They
always yell, “Paul said...Paul said...”, but what
they don’t understand is that Paul was relaying
to us what somebody had written to him. And
they can’t grasp this subject because they’re
baptized in ignorance. They’re baptized in
ignorance and they don’t want to change,
because if they change they have to admit
they’re wrong, and their pride won’t allow them to
admit they’re wrong, because if they admit
they’re wrong then they have to admit that they
really weren’t in tune with God like they claim
they are. So when it comes to this subject of
women in the ministry, we are dealing with
ignorance and pride.
Now I want to go to one last Scripture in
Galatians chapter 3, starting in verse 26: “For ye
are all the children of God by faith in Christ
Jesus.” Now listen to me, if you believe in
Jesus Christ as your Messiah, and you repent of
your sins and you become born-again by faith,
you are the children of God by Christ Jesus. He
birthed you. Then he goes on in verse 27, “For
as many of you as have been baptized into
Christ have put on Christ.” It didn’t say
baptized into water, it said baptized into Christ.
Christ was the Word. You need to be baptized
into Christ. Christ was the Word, He was the
water, the water of the Word. Then it says,
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, neither bond
nor free, there is neither male nor female: for
ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” Now if we
were to take this Scripture literally as some
would like to do, we could say there is no male
or female. Well, obviously, I can look at men
and women and I can tell the difference between
male and female. But if I wanted to take it
literally without studying it out, I could say there
is no difference between men and women, and
I would be ignorant. But that is exactly what so
many Christians do when they insist that Paul
teaches that men are superior to women and
that women should be silent in the Church! They
fail to study the background and find out exactly
what Paul is saying. Instead they continue on in
their ignorance, denying women their place in
the ministry and doing great damage to the Body
of Christ.
|